Print pageEdit pageSearch site:
International Indexing Good Practice Website
Home :: Main :: Alphabetical Order

Main.AlphabeticalOrder History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

07 December 2007 13:32 by James Lamb - spelling corrections
Changed lines 12-13 from:

Recommended: Spaces in items are treated as a letter which preceeds all others. This results in word-by-word? order.

to:

Recommended: Spaces in items are treated as a letter which precedes all others. This results in word-by-word? order.

Changed lines 25-27 from:

But where digits form numbers, then they should be placed in numerical order, so 10Base-T preceeds 100Base-T.

Rationale: Users are more likely to look at the beginning of an index than the end and so will see that the index does include some entries for symbols. Numerical order is more intuitive for numbers.

to:

But where digits form numbers, then they should be placed in numerical order, so 10Base-T precedes 100Base-T.

Rationale: Users are more likely to look at the beginning of an index than the end and so will see that the index does include some entries for numbers. Numerical order is more intuitive for numbers.

09 February 2006 15:36 by James A Lamb -
Changed line 52 from:
Smith, Joan Alice
to:
Smith, Jo Alice
Changed line 64 from:
Smith, Joan Alice
to:
Smith, Jo Alice
Deleted lines 66-84:

Suggestion: For lists of names, sort them alphabetically.

Rationale: It's simple, everybody understands it and the indexing program can do it automatically. If it is important for names with the same initials to sort together then simply omit the names:

So:

Smith, John Alfred becomes Smith, J.A.

and these automatically sort together.


Suggestion: For lists of names, omit full stops between initials.

Rationale: They take up space and add nothing.

09 February 2006 15:33 by James A Lamb -
Changed lines 49-51 from:

This makes it easier to find a person as there will be a single position in the index for them, regardless of whether their name is spelt out. Where there may be multiple entries for a single person, perhaps from the merging of multiple references, they will be brought together. So:

to:

This makes it easier to find a person as there will be a single position in the index for them, regardless of whether their name is spelt out. Where it is certain that J.A. and John Alfred are the same person they will both appear under the same entry, but where it is not known it is helpful to sort them together. So:

Added line 52:
Smith, Joan Alice
Added line 64:
Smith, Joan Alice
05 January 2006 20:31 by IDB -
Changed lines 20-21 from:

Symbols are treated as preceeding letters.

to:

Symbols are treated as preceding letters.

Changed line 24 from:

Digits are treated as following symbols and preceeding letters.

to:

Digits are treated as following symbols and preceding letters.

Changed lines 64-84 from:
Smith, John Alfred
to:
Smith, John Alfred

Suggestion: For lists of names, sort them alphabetically.

Rationale: It's simple, everybody understands it and the indexing program can do it automatically. If it is important for names with the same initials to sort together then simply omit the names:

So:

Smith, John Alfred becomes Smith, J.A.

and these automatically sort together.


Suggestion: For lists of names, omit full stops between initials.

Rationale: They take up space and add nothing.

20 October 2005 18:12 by james at jalamb dot com -
Changed lines 1-6 from:

Alphabetical Order

Commonly Agreed Standard:

to:

Alphabetical Order

Commonly Agreed Standard:

16 October 2005 09:36 by james at jalamb dot com -
Changed lines 8-9 from:

All items beginning with the same letter, whether uppercase or lowercase, are grouped together. Where multiple items begining with the same letter, items are ordered according to the next letter, and so on.

to:

All items beginning with the same letter, whether uppercase or lowercase, are grouped together. Where multiple items begin with the same letter, items are ordered according to the next letter, and so on.

15 October 2005 10:34 by james at jalamb dot com -
Added lines 1-64:

Alphabetical Order

Commonly Agreed Standard:

Items are grouped together according to the way they are spelt and put in the order of the alphabet of the language of the index user. All items beginning with the same letter, whether uppercase or lowercase, are grouped together. Where multiple items begining with the same letter, items are ordered according to the next letter, and so on.

Rationale: Users of indexes are literate and therefore familiar with the order of the letters in their alphabet. They can therefore quickly find a specific item in a long list.

Recommended: Spaces in items are treated as a letter which preceeds all others. This results in word-by-word? order.

Rationale: Word-by-word order is better at grouping together items of similar meanings and so is well suited to subject indexes.

Alternative: Spaces in items are treated as not being present. This results in letter-by-letter? order.

Rationale: Letter-by-letter order groups items purely by their spelling and it can be quicker for the user to find a single item. This order is suitable when the items are not interconnected, such as in dictionaries.

Symbols are treated as preceeding letters.

Rationale: Users are more likely to look at the beginning of an index than the end and so will see that the index does include some entries for symbols.

Digits are treated as following symbols and preceeding letters. But where digits form numbers, then they should be placed in numerical order, so 10Base-T preceeds 100Base-T.

Rationale: Users are more likely to look at the beginning of an index than the end and so will see that the index does include some entries for symbols. Numerical order is more intuitive for numbers.

Additional items (double entries/cross-references) may be created for numbers which are sorted as though they were spelt out. If this is done for any entry, it must be done for all numerical entries in the index.

Rationale: This may group together similar items in a useful fashion. A user must find consistency of rules in an index to be confident that when an item is not found where it logically should be, then there is no information for that item on that topic.

Standard Variant ISO999: Hyphens are treated as spaces.

Rationale: Hyphens are used to join together words in portmanteau fashion and so word-by-word sorting will sort under the first word, e.g Korea-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

Standard Variant CMS Hyphens are treated as not being present.

Rationale: Hyphens are used to separate prefixes from words which would otherwise be confusing or difficult to pronounce and so the prefix is not a word in its own right.


Suggestion: For lists of names, sort by Surname/Family Name and then by Initials of Forename, regardless of whether they are spelt out.

Rationale: This makes it easier to find a person as there will be a single position in the index for them, regardless of whether their name is spelt out. Where there may be multiple entries for a single person, perhaps from the merging of multiple references, they will be brought together. So:

Smith, J.A.
Smith, John Alfred
Smith, J.O.
Smith, James Owen

rather than:

Smith, J.A.
Smith, James Owen
Smith, J.O.
Smith, John Alfred